Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | florian lindhoudt | 10-4 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | cyprien tron | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | janacc | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Gruul Aggro , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Past in Flames ranks #4064 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 79%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Past in Flames is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 1.24 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Past in Flames has a win rate of 51.4%, making it 7.3% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 5 | 61.3% | 0 |
| Storm-Kiln Artist | Creature — Dwarf Shaman | 5 | 61.3% | 0 |
| Desperate Ravings | Instant | 6 | 60.6% | 1 |
| Consider | Instant | 7 | 58.1% | 1 |
| Spikefield Hazard | Instant | 6 | 56.4% | 1 |
| Flusterstorm | Instant | 9 | 56.2% | 1 |
| Preordain | Sorcery | 7 | 54.5% | 1 |
| Sol Ring | Artifact | 6 | 54.4% | 0 |
| Jegantha, the Wellspring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 5 | 51.4% | 1 |
| Frantic Search | Instant | 6 | 51.1% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Past in Flames than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consider | Instant | 1 | 5 | 67.6% | 54.5% | +13.0% |
| Desperate Ravings | Instant | 2 | 5 | 68.4% | 57.6% | +10.8% |
| Echoing Truth | Instant | 2 | 6 | 63.4% | 53.6% | +9.8% |
| Pyromancer Ascension | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 65.0% | 56.1% | +8.9% |
| Flusterstorm | Instant | 1 | 7 | 61.8% | 53.3% | +8.5% |
| Gitaxian Probe | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 61.9% | 54.9% | +7.0% |
| Preordain | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 60.0% | 54.2% | +5.8% |
| Flame of Anor | Instant | 3 | 5 | 56.5% | 50.8% | +5.7% |
| Serum Visions | Sorcery | 1 | 10 | 58.3% | 53.0% | +5.4% |
| Seething Song | Instant | 3 | 8 | 51.5% | 47.2% | +4.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 27 | 2.7% | 43.3% |
| Mono-Red Aggro | 9 | 2.1% | 41.2% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 4 | 0.5% | 68.5% |
| Gruul Aggro | 2 | 0.1% | 12.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.